InfiniBand vs. Ethernet Networking: Key Technical Differences

OptechTW

InfiniBand vs. Ethernet Networking: Key Technical Differences

I. Core Definitions

1. InfiniBand Networking

  • Origin: Developed in 2000 by the IBTA Alliance (Intel, IBM, etc.) for high-performance computing (HPC) and data centers

  • Key Features:

    • Native support for Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA), latency as low as 0.5μs

    • Channel Adapter (CA) architecture bypasses OS kernel

    • Typical use: Supercomputers, AI training clusters, high-frequency trading

2. Ethernet Networking

  • Origin: Created by Xerox in 1973, now governed by IEEE 802.3 standards

  • Key Features:

    • Based on TCP/IP protocol stack, highly compatible

    • Connects via Network Interface Cards (NICs)

    • Typical use: Enterprise networks, cloud computing, home broadband

II. Technical Comparison

Feature InfiniBand Ethernet
Protocol Native RDMA (IB Protocol) TCP/IP (RDMA requires RoCE/iWARP)
Typical Latency 0.5-1 μs 10-100 μs (standard Ethernet)
Bandwidth (2023) 400Gbps (HDR) / 800Gbps (NDR) 400Gbps
Topology Fat-Tree / Dragonfly Star / Tree
Flow Control Credit-based Packet loss-based TCP congestion control
Error Recovery Link-layer retransmission Relies on TCP retransmission
Primary Use Cases HPC, AI training, storage networks (SAN) Enterprise networks, cloud, internet access

III. Key Differences Explained

1. Latency Performance

  • InfiniBand:

    • Achieves sub-microsecond latency via kernel bypass

    • Example: NVIDIA Quantum-2 switches have 0.3μs latency

  • Ethernet:

    • Requires OS protocol stack processing; even with RDMA (RoCEv2), latency remains 5-10μs

2. Protocol Efficiency

  • InfiniBand Header: Only 12 bytes

    text
    复制
    下载
    [ LRH(8B) | BTH(12B) | Payload | CRC(4B) ]

  • Ethernet Header: Minimum 54 bytes (with TCP/IP)

    text
    复制
    下载
    [ Ethernet(14B) | IP(20B) | TCP(20B) | Payload | FCS(4B) ]

3. Scalability

  • InfiniBand:

    • Uses Subnet Manager (SM) for auto-routing

    • Supports tens of thousands of nodes per subnet (e.g., Frontier supercomputer: 37,888 IB nodes)

  • Ethernet:

    • Relies on Spanning Tree/ECMP protocols

    • Large-scale deployments require SDN controllers

IV. When to Choose Which?

Choose InfiniBand For

✅ Ultra-low latency (e.g., high-frequency trading)
✅ Massive parallel computing (e.g., climate modeling)
✅ GPU-to-GPU communication (NVIDIA NVLink over IB)
✅ Storage networks (e.g., Lustre parallel file systems)

Choose Ethernet For

✅ General enterprise networks (cost-sensitive)
✅ Hybrid cloud environments (public cloud integration)
✅ Small/medium virtualization (vSphere/OpenStack)
✅ High-throughput, latency-tolerant apps (e.g., video streaming)

V. Convergence Trends

  1. InfiniBand over Ethernet:

    • NVIDIA’s BlueField DPU runs IB protocol over Ethernet PHY

  2. Ethernet with RDMA:

    • RoCEv2 achieves <10μs latency

  3. Co-Packaged Optics (CPO):

    • Next-gen 800G/1.6T systems share electro-optical interfaces

Market Forecast: By 2026, InfiniBand will dominate HPC (~65%), but Ethernet will capture 40% of AI training (Hyperion Research).

VI. Deployment Recommendations

  • Max performance, budget allowed → InfiniBand HDR/NDR

  • Legacy compatibility needed → RoCEv2 Ethernet

  • Hyperscale deployments → Hybrid NVIDIA Quantum-2 IB + Spectrum-X Ethernet

For tailored solutions, provide:

  • Node count

  • Application type (MPI/Spark/etc.)

  • Traffic pattern (elephant/mice flow ratio)

Back to blog

Contact form